Let me quote the Bible text mentioned above: "44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." KJV.
"Switzerland mulling ‘secret agreements’ with NATO – media..."This is from an article reported widely in Swiss German newspapers that says the following: "The Federal Department of Defense led by Swiss President Viola Amherd will present a report from a study commission intended to provide “impulses for security policy in the coming years. One of the recommendations is to increase cooperation with NATO, which, the commission argues, would strengthen Switzerland’s defense capabilities as NATO will remain the security guarantor for Europe for the foreseeable future. It is the benchmark for modern Western armies and defines the standards for Western military technology."
Now everyone knows that the above cannot be true since the Swine is neutral or so they claim since the Napoleonic Wars. Yet, their actions against Russia in the last few years paint a story of a country completely subjected to and under the influence of Washington and Brussels. Also, having seen the NATO equipment being shot out in Ukraine and now Kursk, well, your standards are low, I would say and do say in many books. Undoubtedly, many Swine are angry about the idea of giving up neutrality because that is what it comes down to. But is this the first time that the Swine had secret agreements with the West? No. Of course not.
Let us see what I wrote in "When Does it End?" - A book about the Jewish Army (not IDF) in Nazi-Occupied Europe during World War Two. Something bad for the Swine happened in 1940 during the chaotic fall of France - then reckoned to be a leading military power very much as is the US Army today. There were a lot of documents captured by the Nazis that proved what is written below ... "General Henri Guisan, the commander of the Swiss Forces, entered into negotiations with France to assist Switzerland in case of a German attack. The Germans found the Swiss correspondence in the French archives after they took Paris. They were obviously annoyed. And it was much more than just talk as is claimed falsely today. The Swiss did indeed improve the roads and build the revetments for heavy artillery for the French army’s use, as agreed to during the Guisan talks. That was a clear breach of neutrality and for a time very worrisome to them. They speculated that the Germans could use it as a reason to attack them and if attacked, the end was always going to be a disaster for the small mountain country. That fear was nothing but a grave indication of a guilty conscience. The Guisan talks should never have happened if they were genuinely neutral."
Guisan was a general stuck in 1914 mode. The best plan they could come up with to defend themselves, and it is still so today, is to destroy their infrastructure and withdraw into an Alpine redoubt from where they would wage a guerrilla war. All in all, defeatist in the extreme. Scorched earth with no chance of regaining what would be lost. It would not be hard to take Swineland, I assure you, it can be done and they will run to their mountains and be trapped there. But why the Germans or anyone else would want to attack the Swine I just don't know. The country has nothing of value to desire - not in human capital or minerals or even a somewhat strategic location. Nothing. Yet, they are very proud that "Nazi Germany never dared to attack them..." Well, again, why should it? Why should anyone? And if attacked, I will applaud on the side of the attacker. So it seems that once again the Swine are playing double games as did their fathers before them. Like I said, John 8:44. That and their empty churches are all that they are good at.
Коментари